imported_BoOsTd

I found this acrticle abit discourageing, but then i remembered the guy who wrote this article test drives super cars for a living. There is some truth to it tho.



Civic Type R review

:cry:

Brett

I would say that this guys expectations were a little to high! That comment about having trouble passing a minivan can't be true... My B16 has no trouble in such a manouver so i can't see an ep3 having any difficulty.

Nova_Dust

It is a different class of car.

90ls

interesting article.


i must agree there is some truth to it.

Cynikal.Mindset

that about sums up almost all hondas

reddevilcivic

hey i dont care at it is saying about the sir but wen u get a 4 banger to be a 8.6 sec. car that is very impressive i dont think that the splitfire civic would have any pb passing a mini van

imported_SiR_YO

:fustrated :fustrated

yO

What's the guy expecting, a corvette type hatch?

GinoLicious

Personally i'm not a big fan of this car. I find it almost looking like a cut off van. Like 1/2 of one. BUt the engine isnt bad.

Notorious

CRXlover

The guys a moron imo, hes the type that would cpmplain the NSX doesnt have enought torque, peugots hatches from what i can remember when living in Britain are a pile of ****

imported_toyman29

lol

90ls

dude dont compare splitfire to this article.

for a 4banger to run that fast how much money is into it.

your not even making any sense.

besides you or i can never have a 8sec 4 banger unless were sitting on some serious cash.

this article is comparing a stock car to what the media is saying.


the Type R is a sweet car because were all into honda/acura

but the moment u get yourself in a BMW or even a Nissan opinions will change.

point here Splitfire is beyond our reach. theydont even pay for half the **** they have. but thats a total seperate topic that i dont want to get into.

i agree with the article the car is overated.

punkindrublic

in europe that car is just another face in the crowd... but here it is something to talk about....