drunk driving cop
#1
drunk driving cop
Linky link
"SALT LAKE CITY - The commander of the Utah Highway Patrol's drunken driving unit has been cited for driving under the influence of alcohol after crashing his cruiser into a concrete barrier, authorities said.
Lt. Fred Swain veered off the shoulder of a highway in Draper early June 23, overcorrected and hit the barrier that separates the lanes, Lt. Doug McCleve said Thursday.
Swain said he fell asleep at the wheel, but officers suspected he had been drinking, said Draper police Sgt. Scott Peck. Swain refused to submit to a breathalyzer test until two patrol captains talked to him, Peck said.
The test showed that Swain's blood-alcohol level was nearly 0.12 percent, Peck said. Utah's legal limit is 0.08 percent.
Swain was placed on paid administrative leave while the patrol conducts an internal investigation.
Contacted by KSL-TV on Thursday, Swain said it was not in his best interest to comment.
Draper police investigated the incident. It's common for law enforcement agencies to ask another agency to investigate incidents involving their own personnel. Draper is about 19 miles south of Salt Lake City."
hahahah
why is he on paid leave?
"SALT LAKE CITY - The commander of the Utah Highway Patrol's drunken driving unit has been cited for driving under the influence of alcohol after crashing his cruiser into a concrete barrier, authorities said.
Lt. Fred Swain veered off the shoulder of a highway in Draper early June 23, overcorrected and hit the barrier that separates the lanes, Lt. Doug McCleve said Thursday.
Swain said he fell asleep at the wheel, but officers suspected he had been drinking, said Draper police Sgt. Scott Peck. Swain refused to submit to a breathalyzer test until two patrol captains talked to him, Peck said.
The test showed that Swain's blood-alcohol level was nearly 0.12 percent, Peck said. Utah's legal limit is 0.08 percent.
Swain was placed on paid administrative leave while the patrol conducts an internal investigation.
Contacted by KSL-TV on Thursday, Swain said it was not in his best interest to comment.
Draper police investigated the incident. It's common for law enforcement agencies to ask another agency to investigate incidents involving their own personnel. Draper is about 19 miles south of Salt Lake City."
hahahah
why is he on paid leave?
#6
Originally posted by ashtonp24
I guess they don't practice what they preach. This makes me hate cops even more.
I guess they don't practice what they preach. This makes me hate cops even more.
yes cops are supposed to uphold a high level of moral conduct being in the position that theyre in, but i think its ignorant of you to hate on an entire profession becuase of the bad judgemnt of an individual. i doubt that if a lawyer or a judge were caught dui, you wouldnt say you hate all lawyers and judges.
#7
the difference is that lawyer don't walk around with guns and lawyers don't walk around picking who to arrest.
When the force overall is blantantly corrupt, how can you say a few bad apples.
I can name a bunch of clubs off the top of my head where you I guarantee you can get drugs in very openly without having any problems. You think the cops don't know? Maybe they find their pockets a little heavier when they go talk to the owner.
I'm not into drugs or the scene whatsoever.
I have a friend who used to DJ, they had a room specifically for VIPs.. this included cops... completely cut off from the club.. they had a few ****** and drugs for them..
anyone who thinks 'protect and serve' is what most cops want to do is living a dream. i think police should be under much more surveillence.
When the force overall is blantantly corrupt, how can you say a few bad apples.
I can name a bunch of clubs off the top of my head where you I guarantee you can get drugs in very openly without having any problems. You think the cops don't know? Maybe they find their pockets a little heavier when they go talk to the owner.
I'm not into drugs or the scene whatsoever.
I have a friend who used to DJ, they had a room specifically for VIPs.. this included cops... completely cut off from the club.. they had a few ****** and drugs for them..
anyone who thinks 'protect and serve' is what most cops want to do is living a dream. i think police should be under much more surveillence.
#8
Originally posted by Bruce Fee
the difference is that lawyer don't walk around with guns and lawyers don't walk around picking who to arrest.
When the force overall is blantantly corrupt, how can you say a few bad apples.
I can name a bunch of clubs off the top of my head where you I guarantee you can get drugs in very openly without having any problems. You think the cops don't know? Maybe they find their pockets a little heavier when they go talk to the owner.
I'm not into drugs or the scene whatsoever.
I have a friend who used to DJ, they had a room specifically for VIPs.. this included cops... completely cut off from the club.. they had a few ****** and drugs for them..
anyone who thinks 'protect and serve' is what most cops want to do is living a dream. i think police should be under much more surveillence.
the difference is that lawyer don't walk around with guns and lawyers don't walk around picking who to arrest.
When the force overall is blantantly corrupt, how can you say a few bad apples.
I can name a bunch of clubs off the top of my head where you I guarantee you can get drugs in very openly without having any problems. You think the cops don't know? Maybe they find their pockets a little heavier when they go talk to the owner.
I'm not into drugs or the scene whatsoever.
I have a friend who used to DJ, they had a room specifically for VIPs.. this included cops... completely cut off from the club.. they had a few ****** and drugs for them..
anyone who thinks 'protect and serve' is what most cops want to do is living a dream. i think police should be under much more surveillence.
and about the club activities, just because the cops dont take immediate action it doesnt mean their pockets are 'heavy'. there could be a number of justifiable reasons theyre not making a bust.
to jump to a conclusion that theyre all in it is also ignorant.
i personally believe there should be more surveillence in many other professions, not just the police service. ie accountants, ceo's, nannies...the list goes on.
i guess its evident im pro police. cops have a bad rap and they dont deserve it.
#9
well, the good thing about your argument is i think lawyers are scum as well.
paid suspension is a joke.
the clubs.. have been there for years... one at least for 8 years now... and i'm sure much before then.
paid suspension is a joke.
the clubs.. have been there for years... one at least for 8 years now... and i'm sure much before then.
#10
Originally posted by andyboy
how can you hate on an entire profession just cuz of one bad apple or a few?
yes cops are supposed to uphold a high level of moral conduct being in the position that theyre in, but i think its ignorant of you to hate on an entire profession becuase of the bad judgemnt of an individual. i doubt that if a lawyer or a judge were caught dui, you wouldnt say you hate all lawyers and judges.
how can you hate on an entire profession just cuz of one bad apple or a few?
yes cops are supposed to uphold a high level of moral conduct being in the position that theyre in, but i think its ignorant of you to hate on an entire profession becuase of the bad judgemnt of an individual. i doubt that if a lawyer or a judge were caught dui, you wouldnt say you hate all lawyers and judges.
The force IS corrupt overall, theres no arguing that. My biggest problem is the way they throw their weight around and are not repramanded for THEIR wrong doings. So its not me trying to be a bada$$ saying I hate cops, its that I truly do hate cops.
As for your 'bad apples' scenario, yes, there are many bad apples out there. And those are the ones who ruin it for all cops. Now if the good cops outweighed the corrupt ones, I'd totally agree with you.
Take X-Coppers for example dude. You think they dont have connections to officers? All they do is take your money and get your charges dropped because of their contacts. Is that not corrupt?
#11
Originally posted by ashtonp24
.
The force IS corrupt overall, theres no arguing that. My biggest problem is the way they throw their weight around and are not repramanded for THEIR wrong doings. So its not me trying to be a bada$$ saying I hate cops, its that I truly do hate cops.
As for your 'bad apples' scenario, yes, there are many bad apples out there. And those are the ones who ruin it for all cops. Now if the good cops outweighed the corrupt ones, I'd totally agree with you.
Take X-Coppers for example dude. You think they dont have connections to officers? All they do is take your money and get your charges dropped because of their contacts. Is that not corrupt?
.
The force IS corrupt overall, theres no arguing that. My biggest problem is the way they throw their weight around and are not repramanded for THEIR wrong doings. So its not me trying to be a bada$$ saying I hate cops, its that I truly do hate cops.
As for your 'bad apples' scenario, yes, there are many bad apples out there. And those are the ones who ruin it for all cops. Now if the good cops outweighed the corrupt ones, I'd totally agree with you.
Take X-Coppers for example dude. You think they dont have connections to officers? All they do is take your money and get your charges dropped because of their contacts. Is that not corrupt?
as with that bad apples, you DONT know that the bad out-weighs the good. your only assuming theres more bad apples cuz of the few cases you read in the paper. in order to know theres more bad than good, you have to know the size of the force and every single good and bad cop out there. and quite frankly i dont think you do.
if you "truely hate cops" like you say then next time youre getting mugged or being violated in any way...dont ever call them.
#12
Originally posted by andyboy
im gonna have to totally disagree with you. the force is not corrupt overall. im just gonna leave it at that.
im gonna have to totally disagree with you. the force is not corrupt overall. im just gonna leave it at that.
#13
Originally posted by andyboy
im gonna have to totally disagree with you. the force is not corrupt overall. im just gonna leave it at that.
as with that bad apples, you DONT know that the bad out-weighs the good. your only assuming theres more bad apples cuz of the few cases you read in the paper. in order to know theres more bad than good, you have to know the size of the force and every single good and bad cop out there. and quite frankly i dont think you do.
if you "truely hate cops" like you say then next time youre getting mugged or being violated in any way...dont ever call them.
im gonna have to totally disagree with you. the force is not corrupt overall. im just gonna leave it at that.
as with that bad apples, you DONT know that the bad out-weighs the good. your only assuming theres more bad apples cuz of the few cases you read in the paper. in order to know theres more bad than good, you have to know the size of the force and every single good and bad cop out there. and quite frankly i dont think you do.
if you "truely hate cops" like you say then next time youre getting mugged or being violated in any way...dont ever call them.
#14
Originally posted by andyboy
as with that bad apples, you DONT know that the bad out-weighs the good. your only assuming theres more bad apples cuz of the few cases you read in the paper. in order to know theres more bad than good, you have to know the size of the force and every single good and bad cop out there. and quite frankly i dont think you do.
as with that bad apples, you DONT know that the bad out-weighs the good. your only assuming theres more bad apples cuz of the few cases you read in the paper. in order to know theres more bad than good, you have to know the size of the force and every single good and bad cop out there. and quite frankly i dont think you do.
If you do know for a fact then I will retract all statments I've made.
An example of why I dont like the police. When we had our variety store and 3 young adults were busting our front door with a bat it took them almost 2.5 hrs to send 1 cruiser consisting of 1 officer when the station nearest to us is not even 10mins away.
Yes I know they have priorities but how would they know if the situation couldnt have easily escalated to someone getting seriously hurt or losing their life?
I'm with the others who have posted in this thread. Until there is a MASSIVE overhaul of the system I will continue to dislike and will not trust in the police.
#15
i know for a fact that metro has over 5000 uniformed police officers. and when i say i believe that the force is good overall, i AT LEAST have knowledge of the size of the force and not just form an opinion based on a few stories reported in the paper or heresay and nothing else.
#17
yeah my step dad has been a cop for 35 years.. he rrr drives after drinking the good half of a 24, he wouldnt do it driving his cruiser tho, but still, i dont approve of it
#20
Originally posted by andyboy
In order to know theres more bad than good, you have to know the size of the force and every single good and bad cop out there.
In order to know theres more bad than good, you have to know the size of the force and every single good and bad cop out there.
Originally posted by andyboy
i know for a fact that metro has over 5000 uniformed police officers. and when i say i believe that the force is good overall, i AT LEAST have knowledge of the size of the force and not just form an opinion based on a few stories reported in the paper or heresay and nothing else.
i know for a fact that metro has over 5000 uniformed police officers. and when i say i believe that the force is good overall, i AT LEAST have knowledge of the size of the force and not just form an opinion based on a few stories reported in the paper or heresay and nothing else.