Medical research on animals
#1
Medical research on animals
where do you draw the line?
we can test things on animals and save thousands of human lives.
but what right do we have testing on primates or lower level animals?
i personally think we should test everything on convicted rapists, pedofiles, serial killers, george bush, and such.
human test subjects would give much more accurate results and we wouldn't be hurting 'innocent' animals.
we can test things on animals and save thousands of human lives.
but what right do we have testing on primates or lower level animals?
i personally think we should test everything on convicted rapists, pedofiles, serial killers, george bush, and such.
human test subjects would give much more accurate results and we wouldn't be hurting 'innocent' animals.
#5
Originally posted by Shazza
but we already do medical research on humans; drugs don't reach the market unless tested on humans first.
but we already do medical research on humans; drugs don't reach the market unless tested on humans first.
and i dont think humans are top of the food chain, i'm pretty sure a tiger could whoop my ***.
#7
I can tell you that I don't agree with animal testing but since I'm asthmatic and know animals played a part in the testing of the medicine I use, who am I to say shiat. As for the use on convicts, go for it as long as there is no doubt they commited the crime they are in for.
#8
Originally posted by pain2bare
I can tell you that I don't agree with animal testing but since I'm asthmatic and know animals played a part in the testing of the medicine I use, who am I to say shiat.
I can tell you that I don't agree with animal testing but since I'm asthmatic and know animals played a part in the testing of the medicine I use, who am I to say shiat.
#14
i'm not saying everybody in jail.
like a professional bank robber or whatever.. those people are okay.. i'm talking about thrill killers... pedofiles.. people that you don't really want integrating into society.
people who have killed in the line of duty.. it's kind of their job.. so it's a little different.. i think so at least...
they will still cost money.. but at least instead of just taking away from society.. they will be giving..
like imagine how many people can be saved by harvesting organs from a rapist. bone marrow... muscle tissue.. a heard.. kidney.. so many things..
like a professional bank robber or whatever.. those people are okay.. i'm talking about thrill killers... pedofiles.. people that you don't really want integrating into society.
people who have killed in the line of duty.. it's kind of their job.. so it's a little different.. i think so at least...
they will still cost money.. but at least instead of just taking away from society.. they will be giving..
like imagine how many people can be saved by harvesting organs from a rapist. bone marrow... muscle tissue.. a heard.. kidney.. so many things..
#15
Originally posted by Bruce Fee
they will still cost money.. but at least instead of just taking away from society.. they will be giving..
they will still cost money.. but at least instead of just taking away from society.. they will be giving..
#17
Originally posted by Si98
animals still cost money. jailbirds are free.
animals still cost money. jailbirds are free.
#20
HELL YA...I AGREE do the testing on the "Bush", rapists, pedophiles etc. people who are in JAIL FOR LIFE, NO PAROLE...
all those in jail, they get paid for sitting in jail, some when they come out, they have degrees in law, everything, while we work, we are paying them to sit in jail and get degrees for FREE, while we have to pay for our education...
all those in jail, they get paid for sitting in jail, some when they come out, they have degrees in law, everything, while we work, we are paying them to sit in jail and get degrees for FREE, while we have to pay for our education...