Which Cold Air Intake?
#8
Better in terms of what? Price, fit, gains?
I upgraded to an AEM from a generic CAI simply because the AEM was better quality and fit better. I didn't notice any difference in performance over the cheapo one I started with. I'd suggest the Auto Warehouse CAI with a K&N filter. There's better things you can spend $300 for your car instead of a name-brand intake.
I upgraded to an AEM from a generic CAI simply because the AEM was better quality and fit better. I didn't notice any difference in performance over the cheapo one I started with. I'd suggest the Auto Warehouse CAI with a K&N filter. There's better things you can spend $300 for your car instead of a name-brand intake.
#9
definately not mugen thast for sure.... there was an s2000 done in mugen sure it looked sweet but all the mugen acessories put on actually made less power then a stock s2000 did
defiantely go no name pipe and k&n filter though
defiantely go no name pipe and k&n filter though
#14
Check out the dyno sheets they pride themselves on their testing there is also independent testing finding the same if not better result from the V2 systems. These are tested on stock vehicles with nothing else done to them.
#16
www.TPRMAG.com
In Tuner Performance Report Spring 2003 issue they done tests on different intakes on a 99 Civic Si (SiR)
In Tuner Performance Report Spring 2003 issue they done tests on different intakes on a 99 Civic Si (SiR)
#18
Originally posted by JusBlaze
No way 7hp from an intake alone.... an I/H/E combo on a civic you'd be lucky to get like 10hp
No way 7hp from an intake alone.... an I/H/E combo on a civic you'd be lucky to get like 10hp
And those 7-10 horses are available at the high end of the rpm range...how often do you cruise around at 6000 rpm?
I say save your money.